Tuesday, May 26, 2020

Virtual assessment need not terrify universities


In one of the big stories in The Standard of May 26, 2020, it is reported that public universities in Kenya are facing a challenge in administering end of semester exams following the end of online lectures. Assessment and feedback practices can be challenging even in the best of times, especially if virtual. It is therefore understandable that universities are struggling to manage assessment during the current pandemic.

I have had occasion to reflect on the question of the role of assessment and feedback in a student-centered learning environment. My conclusion, which some may (dis)agree with is that, in both theory and practice, there needs to be alignment between the learning outcomes, teaching and learning activities, as well as the assessment strategy.

John Biggs – the famous Australian educational psychologist – proposed[1] the adoption of a constructivist pedagogical approach where the focus is always on what the learner is actually doing, placing the learning activities at the heart of the process. This is easier said than done in time of "inside and online".

While Kenyan universities would in all likelihood have established clear guidelines for teaching, learning and assessment that faculties and departments are required to implement, the need to have complementary mechanisms for quality inspection and quality control with regard to assessment and feedback as central components of the teaching and learning process cannot be overstated. 

In the referenced story, university officials are said to be exploring ways to come up with secure and cost-effective methods of assessing students online, which will guarantee quality and check exam malpractice.

I have previously argued that assessment and feedback has an important role in students’ learning. It acts as an important interface between learning objectives and outcomes. Judicious use of effective assessment methods and practices has value and potential to significantly improve learning outcomes. Given that there are diverse assessment methods, selective application of such methods is of essence and has a bearing on learning, particularly in the context of virtual teaching and learning.

In my experience I found that adapting assessment methods and practices to students’ learning styles and processes holds great promise to improving learning outcomes. This means that assessments methods and practices must be adapted to the reality under Covid-19. Since this is new for most of us it goes without saying that there is need for research on design and use of diverse assessment methods in all levels of learning domains.

Sharing experiences on various aspects of assessment design and application across the academe can go a long way in making the search for effective assessment solutions less daunting, and certainly less traumatic than the report suggests.




[1] Biggs, J.B., 2011. Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. McGraw-hill education (UK).

No comments:

Post a Comment